Posted by: PensionsGuru | February 14, 2012

Pension Income reduced by Quantitative Easing

The Bank of England’s emergency programme of printing money to support the economy has helped push pension incomes to record lows, its own figures showed yesterday.

Experts warned that returns on annuities had fallen so low that people about to retire should seriously consider investing their pension funds elsewhere.

Many pensioners use their retirement pot to buy an annuity, a guaranteed lifetime annual income based on the yields on government bonds, or gilts.

The Bank’s Quantitative Easing (QE) programme has put £275billion of new money into the economy, created by it buying gilts from commercial banks. Increased demand for gilts pushes down the yield, or interest rate, paid to holders, lowering borrowing costs across the economy and stimulating demand.

Campaign groups, including Saga, have warned that lower gilt yields undermine pension incomes.

Research by the Bank’s economists yesterday estimated that the QE programme reduced gilt yields by around 1.5 perc
http://www.pensiondrawdownuk.co.uk/pension-income-reduced-by-quantitative-easing.html

Posted by: PensionsGuru | February 14, 2012

It’s time to scrap pensions in favour of savings

Dr Ros Altmann, a former pensions adviser to No.10, wants a radical overhaul to retirement saving in the UK: to scrap pensions and introduce ‘lifetime savings’.

Here, she sets out her key assertions and explains each one.
http://www.pensiondrawdownuk.co.uk/its-time-to-scrap-pensions-in-favour-of-savings.html

Posted by: PensionsGuru | August 31, 2011

Force annuity buyers to shop around for the best rate

Insurance giant Aviva has broken ranks with its fellow pension providers, arguing that retirees should be forced to shop around for an annuity.
The typical person could boost their retirement income by between 10pc and 20pc by getting the best annuity deal.
The company is stepping up pressure on the Government to make the “open market option” – where customers must find the best value provider for their lifetime income themselves rather than taking a default option from their pension provider – the default.
http://onlywire.com/r/50663501

Posted by: PensionsGuru | July 5, 2010

Customers consider pensions for CGT protection

Pensions have become more attractive as a shield against tax following the raise in capital gains tax (CGT) for high income earners according to Credencis.

The increase in CGT to 28 per cent gave more incentive to protect gains by moving assets into pensions.

By moving dividend income or rent from property into Self Invested Personal Pensions (Sipps), high earners could get tax benefits and shelter from capital gains tax.

Once shares are within a Sipp all growth is protected. Brian Flindall from Credencis says “It creates more reason to put assets into a Sipp because you protect assets in the future.”

“It makes sense to pay a little CGT now if that means avoiding a much bigger bill in the future.”

We are situated  near to Derby, Leicester, and Nottingham.

Credencis

“Live for today, Invest for tomorrow”

Posted by: PensionsGuru | June 23, 2010

Budget outlines temporary age 77 pension rule

The government has proposed raising the age at which members of registered pension schemes have to buy an annuity to 77 as an interim measure before it scraps compulsory annuitisation.

Chancellor George Osborne confirmed in the Budget the abolition of compulsory annuitisation at age 75 in April 2011, along with changes to inheritance tax (IHT) charges on pension drawdown funds.

However the chancellor also promised interim measures for those approaching 75 who have yet to secure an income.

The change to the age 75 rule will also apply for the purposes of inheritance tax (IHT) charges that specifically apply to pension scheme members over 75.

In the interim period before the total abolition of the age 75 rule in 2011-12 tax year there will be a 35% charge on lump sum death benefits paid to the scheme if they die on after 22 June 2010 and are aged 75 or over.

For members who are both 75 or over and in drawdown IHT charges will not apply. Previously there could have been a maximum 82% charge on the value of the fund.

Consultation on the rules will begin tomorrow

For bespoke pension advice contact Credencis.

We are situated near to Derby, Leicester, and Nottingham.

Credencis

“Live for today, Invest for tomorrow”

Posted by: PensionsGuru | June 18, 2010

Parents advise children to turn to pensions not property

Recession-weary parents are warning their children not to pin all their financial hopes on property and to look to pensions as well according to Aviva.

Almost half, 47 per cent, of the 1,000 UK homeowners surveyed said they would be making sure their child saves into a pension.

Over three quarters of those surveyed said relying solely on property to fund retirement was too risky, while over half believed people in the UK were too obsessed with getting on the property ladder.

The majority, 88 per cent, of parents were worried about their child’s financial futures, with seven out of ten concerned there would be no state pension by the time their youngsters retired.

Others worried their children would have to work past retirement age or have to take a second job to pay for their retirement. Nearly a quarter thought they woul have to sacrifice pension payments to get on the property ladder.

Paul Goodwin, head of pensions at Aviva, said the insurer wanted to help people do everything they could to afford the lifestyle they would like in retirement.

He said: “All too often people put off saving for the future, but individuals really need to make sure that they’re doing something about it today.

“Relying solely on property is a risk and it’s far more sensible to spread your savings for the future in both your home and a pension plan.”

For bespoke pension advice contact Credencis.

We are situated near to Derby, Leicester, and Nottingham.

Credencis

“Live for today, Invest for tomorrow”

Posted by: PensionsGuru | June 18, 2010

Will Final salary pensions exist much longer?

Most companies have already closed the costly schemes to new members and today’s figures suggested 94 per cent plan to either close them altogether or reduce benefits that existing members can accrue.

The rising cost of the generous schemes, which are based on a worker’s final salary, means companies can no longer afford to guarantee to pay out what they promised.

Many companies are switching to cheaper defined contribution schemes, which rely on the performance of the stock market instead.

The number of companies that have closed their defined benefit pension schemes to existing members has more than doubled during the past year, from 14 per cent to 32 per cent, and a further 30 per cent of employers intend to close their schemes to existing staff, according to the survey of almost 180 companies, carried out by accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Just 6 per cent of companies said they intended to maintain their defined benefit pension in its current form.

Marc Hommel, pension’s partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said: “Employers are sounding a repetitive death knell for defined benefit pensions.

“Numerous factors, including the size and volatility of funding costs, and also concerns about the inequality of pensions provision within an employer’s workforce, are accelerating their demise.”

Companies are actively encouraging former employees to transfer their pension liabilities elsewhere.

Just over half of companies said they planned to offer enhanced transfer values to workers who had money in their defined benefit pension scheme who had since left the company, up from just 8 per cent who did so last year.

The survey also found that 87 per cent of companies think their staff are not saving enough for retirement and 60 per cent think people will not be able to retire when they want to due to insufficient savings.

Seven out of 10 also think plans to reduce the amount of pensions tax relief high earners receive will lead to lower pension provision for all people.

For bespoke pension advice contact Credencis.

We are situated neat to Derby, Leicester, and Nottingham.

Credencis

“Live for today, Invest for tomorrow”

Posted by: PensionsGuru | June 18, 2010

Now is the time for First Time buyers

Research carried out by Santander Mortgages appeared to show buying is cheaper than renting in every area in the UK except London.

According to the bank’s research, would-be buyers currently renting outside of London could save themselves an average of £1,040 a year if they were able to own their own property.

The average monthly rent in the UK, excluding London, is currently just over £420 compared to monthly repayments of £334 for the average first-time buyer – an average saving for homeowners of £86 a month.

Only those in the capital will be better off if they continue renting. Despite rental prices in London being roughly 56 per cent higher than the average across the UK, at £701 a month, exceptionally high house prices mean it would, on average, cost potential first-time buyers an additional £359 a month to buy.

Phil Cliff, director of mortgage marketing at Santander UK said: “The now average loan to value of 75 per cent for first-time-buyers has provided an obstacle in some cases but saving for a deposit is clearly a wise move. Lenders are also looking to offer higher LTV products while the government’s announcement that it will help boost the number of new homes is all positive news for those wishing to take their first steps on the property ladder.”

For free independent mortgage advice contact Big Mortgages.

We are situated near to Derby, Leicester, and Nottingham.

Big Mortgages

Posted by: PensionsGuru | June 15, 2010

New Changes For The State Second Pension

In 2012, many people will be automatically contracted back into the additional State Pension.

Many of the recent changes to the tax system have been concerned with personal pensions, and the level of public sector pension commitment is a thorny election issue. But with next year’s 1% hike in National Insurance rates looming ever nearer, what exactly do we get for our money in terms of additional state pensions?

SERPS and S2P

Of course, if you are as old as me you will remember SERPS, the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme. Provided you were ‘contracted in’ to the scheme, you built up an entitlement for additional State Pension payments from the government.

However, this scheme was deemed to be in need of reform. In April 2002, SERPS was replaced with the new State Second Pension, usually shortened to S2P.

If you are ‘contracted out’ of S2P, a rebate is paid into a separate pension scheme for your benefit (the same thing happened with SERPS). By contracting out in this fashion, you are effectively betting that your rebates would grow over time and provide a larger annual payment than you would have received had you stayed in S2P.

In practice, working out whether this will actually be the case is horrendously complex and many people have been advised that they would be better off contracting back in to the additional State Pension as a ‘safer’ option.

All change in 2012

From 6 April 2012 though, many people will no longer have this choice. From this date, you will no longer be able to contract out of S2P using a personal/stakeholder pension or a company pension or occupational pension scheme which is contracted out on a ‘money purchase’ or ‘defined contribution’ basis. Instead, you’ll be contracted back in and you will build up an entitlement to the additional State Pension instead.

The government justified this change by emphasising just how complicated it was to work out whether it was worth contracting out. You can’t argue with that. However, in reforming the S2P system, they have also shifted its focus in favour of lower earners at the expense of the better off.

So how exactly does the new scheme work, and what proportion of your hard-earned and grudgingly paid National Insurance contributions actually go towards your own future benefits?

The new S2P system

Between the lower earnings limit of £5,044 a year and £14,100, entitlement accrues at 40% of earnings. However, provided you earn at least £5,044, your S2P entitlement will be based on £14,100 rather than your actual earnings. This is known as Band 1.

In 2012, Band 1 income will earn you a flat rate of £1.60 in additional State Pension instead (which is much the same result as using the current calculation method).

Between £14,100 and the upper accruals point of £40,040, entitlement to the additional State Pension accrues at the less generous rate of 10% of earnings. This is known as Band 2. It is intended that this upper accruals point will be frozen in cash terms, so this 10% entitlement would become eroded by inflation over time.

In 2030/31 this 10% rate will be abolished and there will then be a flat rate across all income amounts up to the upper accrual point. So everyone who qualifies for the additional State Pension will then earn the same amount each year.

Great news for lower earners

One point to note is that S2P entitlement kicks in before any actual National Insurance contribution are payable at the primary threshold of £5,715. This means that if you just so happen to earn, say, £5,600, you would pay no National Insurance, but would earn entitlement to S2P.

Even better, this entitlement would accrue not at that very low salary level, but at the £14,100 assumed income as mentioned above.

David Heaton, Employment Tax Specialist at Baker Tilly illustrates the unusual effect this can have by way of an example. If a taxpayer earns £7,000, he will pay National Insurance of £141 (being £7,000 less the primary threshold of £5,715 at 11%). However, his S2P will be calculated on the maximum £14,100 less the lower earnings limit of £5,044, namely £3,622. This could translate to an annual S2P of £105 in exchange for an annual contribution of just £141.

It seems highly likely that this system will be tinkered with again before 2030/31. But there’s a clear message being sent — if you want a decent income in retirement, then you’ll have to provide it yourself.

For pension advice contact Credencis.

We are situated near to Derby, Leicester, and Nottingham.

Credencis

“Live for today, Invest for tomorrow”

Posted by: PensionsGuru | June 8, 2010

Pension payouts slump to all-time lows

New retirees are being hit by the lowest pension payouts ever recorded, leaving them with scant returns on their hard-earned nest eggs. Sharply falling annuity rates have plunged to their lowest level in more than two decades, with rates for a couple in their 60s sinking below 6%.

This means that retirees taking their pensions today are being forced to accept a smaller income than someone buying an annuity with the same pot just a few months ago.

And the bad news for those approaching retirement is that the situation doesn’t look like improving in the near future.

Back at the beginning of April, a man aged 65 with a wife aged 60 buying an joint annuity with a £100,000 pension pot would have received £6,080 a year.

Today, he would get £5,860. It means rates have fallen by 3.6% in two months.

Essentially a type of insurance product, an annuity provides a regular income for the rest of your life. As it stands, anyone with a pension is required to buy one by the age of 75.

But this could change under the new Lib-Con government, with its coalition agreement promising to ‘end the rules requiring compulsory annuitisation at 75′.

Yet for the estimated 250,000 people who will buy an annuity this year, the proposals will offer scant consolation: all the major annuity providers have cut their rates within the last month.

The list of those slashing rates includes Canada Life, Prudential, Aegon, Legal & General and Standard Life.

The downward pressure on annuity rates has come, in the main, from a slump in gilt yields. This is because insurers primarily invest annuity money in gilts, then pay customers using the income from the yield.

With gilt yields still volatile, the outlook for annuities remains gloomy.

The reasons for falling yields is a complex mixture of concerns about debt problems in the Eurozone economies, a flight from equities to gilts and as investors shun the stock market and the likelihood that central banks will keep interest rates lower for longer.

Looking at historic annuity charts, rates are only heading in one direction – south. Even if bond rates do go up, Credencis feel annuities won’t rise nearly as much.

Worse still Credencis say pensioners are still losing hundreds of pounds each year because they are not shopping around for their annuity.

Graph: How annuity rates have declined over the last two decades

Annuity rates and the FTSE100 1990-2010

Source: This is Money

// <![CDATA[// enlarge

This shopping around is called using the Open Market Option (OMO). Everyone with retirement savings is entitled to find a better annuity provider when they take their pension. Yet, despite the attempts of many insurers, many seem unaware of the potential to better their income.

In 2009, 290,000 retiring investors, 63% of the total number, bought an annuity from their pension provider, according to research by Hargreaves Lansdown. At least 175,000 of those policies were big enough to get a competitive annuity quotation (a value of £5,000 or above).

‘Shopping around for an annuity at retirement is a simple step that could increase pensioner incomes by hundreds of pounds a year without costing the Treasury a penny,’ Brian Flindall from Credencis says.

‘Doing this could boost your income by 20% – possibly more if you have a medical condition that allows you to buy an enhanced annuity.

This,  is part of the ‘good news’ that could just about help the savvy saver mitigate the declines.

If fund values were going up faster than annuities were falling, then we wouldn’t have so much of a problem. But they’re not. Rates are heading south and they are unlikely to rise. It means investors are being hit by a pensions double-whammy.

The good news is that if you take advice and are confident enough to take on some risk, you can counter these effects.

‘With annuities, you’re taking a long-term decision, so you need to assess all the alternatives. If you have a pot of £50,000 or more, you should seriously consider splitting between fixed and investment-linked annuities to provide a better income throughout retirement, says Brian Flindall of Credencis.

Credencis says another strategy potential for beating low rates could be hedging your income by buying some using some of your pot to buy an annuity now, and some at a later date. However, they warn that there is nothing to say rates won’t continue to fall, leaving you out of pocket, because annuity rate movements are ‘always extremely difficult to predict’.

For bespoke annuity advice contact Credencis.

We are situated near to Derby, Leicester, and Nottingham.

Credencis

“Live for today, Invest for tomorrow”

We are s

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.